Ricouer's interpretation theory consists of three stages (1) The Guess, (2) Validation, and (3) Comprehension and Appropriation. Right now I' m thinking about the Guess. This is the phase where one elucidates one's preliminary understandings of the text. Here one allows the text speak and takes its discourse at face value. In phenomenological terms, one observes as the text reveals itself through the appearance of various horizons. One then makes a preliminary guess concerning the meaning of these horizons apart from exegetical inquiry.
Horizons are similar to themes. However, horizons are unlimited and they are never static. For example, when I gaze into the sunset on the horizon, the way the horizon appears to me changes because I change my physical proximity to it, the descent of the sun, the movement of the clouds, or the appearance or disappearance of people or objects on the horizon that I had not anticipated. Likewise, horizons that appear in lived experience or in text become visible and recede or change as new aspects previously hidden to me come into my view.
So, how will I get to my Guess regarding John's Apocalypse? Because I am approaching John's Apocalypse not as prophetic literature but as narrative, I am beginning with David Barr's analysis of this text as three interrelated stories about Jesus. Barr structures the text around three scrolls: (a) the Letter Scroll (1:1-3:22), (b) the Worship Scroll (4:1-11:18), (c) the War Scroll (11:19-22:21).
In order to develop my Guess I plan to write 3 articles of around 1200 words each, one article for each Scroll. In these articles, I will simply observe and document the horizons that appear to me and describe their relationship to my research question which is: What does organizational leadership mean in a chaotic, nihilistic, and apocalyptic era?
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Catching Up
Well, I can't believe its been almost 10 months since I posted to this blog. I took on new responsibilities at work and my dissertation went on the back burner. I had hoped to graduate this May, but that is not going to happen. So, I have to pick myself up and start again.
Not finishing is not an option!
So, let's review what has worked well in the past.
1) writing at least 200 words a day worked well.
2) spending an hour in the morning and an hour in the evening writing worked well.
I am still working on the Literature Review. I've gotten really tired of this section. So, on the advice of my Chairperson, I am going to start writing the Methodology chapter to take a break.
On the positive side. the first chapter of my dissertation was one of six winners of the Christian Business Faculty Association Dissertation Showcase. I presented the paper at the CBFA annual conference in Indianapolis this past November.
Not finishing is not an option!
So, let's review what has worked well in the past.
1) writing at least 200 words a day worked well.
2) spending an hour in the morning and an hour in the evening writing worked well.
I am still working on the Literature Review. I've gotten really tired of this section. So, on the advice of my Chairperson, I am going to start writing the Methodology chapter to take a break.
On the positive side. the first chapter of my dissertation was one of six winners of the Christian Business Faculty Association Dissertation Showcase. I presented the paper at the CBFA annual conference in Indianapolis this past November.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)